Person Perception: Making judgment about others
Attribution Theory:
While observing people’s behavior
such as getting an overseas
assignment or promotion to top management position
or failed miserably in university examination or fired from the
employer etc, we attempt to determine whether it was internally caused or external
caused. If those factors such
as knowledge, skill, effort, talent, hard work, positive attitude are responsible for the
occurrence of behavior, it is labeled as internally caused. Internally caused
behaviors are those that are believed to be under the personal control of the individual. If those factors such as
situational factors such as location advantage, non availability of material, contacts with
influential
others,
etc are responsible
for the occurrence of behavior, it is labeled
as externally caused.
Externally caused behavior is seen
as resulting from outside causes; that is, the person is seen as forced into the behavior by the situation.
If an employee is late for work, one can attribute
his late coming due to laziness or lack of interest
in the job of over sleeping. This
would be internal
interpretation.
If an employee late coming is due to traffic jam or road accident or his wife sickness, then he
is making external attribution.
There are three
factors which are used to determine whether
the behavior is caused by internal factors
or due to external factors. They are: Distinctiveness,
Consensus
and Consistency.
Distinctiveness:
It refers to whether an individual
displays different behaviors
in different situations. If a person is coming late not only to office
but also to picnic party or to birth
day party or to attending meeting etc. If his late coming
behavior is not unique, it will probably be judged as internal.
(Low Distinctiveness) If his
late coming behavior
is unusual, that is, only
to office work,
his late coming
behavior
is due to external attribution. (High Distinctiveness)
Consensus:
It refers to
whether all the people who are facing with a similar situation respond in the same way or not. If all the people are responding
the same way, then there is high consensus. If consensus is high, then his late coming behavior is due to external factors.
If only this worker is late and all others are punctual,
then there is low consensus. If consensus is low, then his late coming is due to internal factor
Consistency:
It refers whether a person responds the same all the time, that is, whether his late coming
is common in all the days or once in a blue moon. If his late coming is reported
in all the days, then there is high consistency. If there
is high consistency, his late coming behavior is due to internal factor.
If his late coming is
reported only one time, then there is low consistency. If there is low consistency, then his late coming is due to external
factors. The more consistent
the behavior,
the more the observer is inclined to attribute it to internal
factors.
Errors in Attribution:
While
attributing the causes for the behavior of individuals, people tend to commit
two types of errors.
Fundamental Attribution Error:
There is
tendency to underestimate the influence of external factors and overestimate
the influence of internal factors
when making judgment
about the behavior
of others particularly with reference to the victims of accidents
or failures.
This
is called the fundamental
attribution errors. For example, a sales manager is likely to attribute the
poor performance of his sales agents to laziness rather than to the new product
line introduced by the competitor or current recession prevailing in the society etc
Self-Serving Bias:
There is
also a tendency for individuals to attribute their own success to internal
factors such as ability or effort, while putting
the blame for failure on external factors
such as luck or fate. This is called the self-serving bias. While assessing
the performance of subordinates, the managers are likely
to
provide
feedback
in
a
distorted
manner depending on whether it is positive
or negative.
No comments:
Post a Comment